James was certainly 'fertile', and he believed in the efficacy of what he was doing. He left it until Chapter VIII of the final volume to share with his readers the values of romance writing.
"What is truth?" The romance-writer has a great advantage. He has the truth within himself. All the witnesses are there in his own bosom. Experience supplies the facts which observation has collected, and imagination arrays and adorns them. In fact, I believe that, philosophically speaking, a romance is much truer than history. If it be not, it will produce but little effect upon the mind of the reader. The author, however, must not sit down to write it coolly, as a mere matter of composition. He must believe it, he must feel it, he must think of nothing but telling the truth - ay, reader, the truth, of the creatures of his own imagination. It must be all truth to him, and he must give that truth to the world. As they act, think, speak, in his own mind, so must they act, think, and speak to the public; and according to his own powers of imagining the truth, regarding certain characters, so will he tell a truthful tale, or a mere cold fiction.
Perhaps this is a major reason as to why I enjoy reading his novels. His characters, in all their variety, do appear very true to life.
There are two young heroes - Edward Hayward, late Captain of the 40th regiment ; and 'Mr. Beauchamp', a very gentlemanlike - even distinguished - looking person of about thirty years of age. At the outset of the story, they rescue one of the heroines, Mary Clifford, and her mother from a kidnapping attempt. The women are escorted by Hayward to Tarningham Park, the mansion of Mrs Clifford's brother, Sir John Slingsby, a part-Rabelaisian figure who is one of the stand-out characters in the tale. Honest Jack Slingsby! Roystering Sir John! Jolly old Jack! Glorious Johnny!...that round and portly form, now extending the white waistcoat and black-silk breeches...that face, glowing with the grape in all its different hues...to the deep purple of old port in the nose...that thin white hair, flaring up into a cockatoo on the top of his head... Marvellous! His daughter, Isabella, tries her best to keep her father on a straighter path, but has more or less given up, being unable to rival good food, drink and reckless expenditure. Hayward, who, at the start of the novel, maintains I never fell in love with a beautiful woman in my life - I don't like them; they are always pert, or conceited, or vain, or haughty, or foolish, falls for the beautiful Mary Clifford; whilst Beauchamp falls for the equally beautiful Isabella. There is a rocky path ahead, particularly for Isabella (for is 'Mr Beauchamp' really who he says he is?).
Every good novel should have at least one 'baddie'. Beauchamp has five, with a sixth realising the error of his ways, literally becoming a poacher turned gamekeeper. Mr Wittingham was somewhat past the middle age, and verging towards that decline of life which is marked by protuberance of the stomach, and thinness of the legs...tolerably rosy in the gills. He had accumulated wealth as a merchant on a small scale and strove to become a country gentleman, by whatever means. His son, Henry, with a disposition naturally vehement and passionate, had been rendered irritable and reckless, and a character self-willed and perverse had become obstinate and disobedient. He was to be involved in nearly all of the skullduggery taking place throughout the novel. Real evil, however, is reserved for the other three malign characters. Captain Charles Moreton, a cousin of Beauchamp and a bad, reckless man, and a sleek knave, dedicated to the latter's downfall; and Charlotte Hay who, though once pretty, had become somewhat coarse now, however, and looked as if the process of deterioration had been assisted by a good deal of wine, or some other stimulant perhaps still more potent. She held the dangerous clue to an incident in Beauchamp's past life. As for Mr Wharton, the grasping lawyer whose aim is to eject Sir John from his home as he is mortgaged to him up to the hilt, it is enough to castigate him as a cove and a blackguard.
Other well-drawn characters include the young Billy Lamb, the pot-boy at the White Hart, Tarningham: the back was bowed and contorted...the legs were thin, and more like a bird's than a human being's...the features that appeared below the tall forehead seemed all to be squeezed together, so as to acquire a rat-like expression, not uncommon in the deformed. But Billy is to prove a good egg and important to the success of the heroes. His brother-in-law, Ste Gimlet, nicknamed the Wolf, starts out on the wrong side of the law, but is also instrumental in ensuring good triumphs over evil.
Occasionally, the 'humour' seems a little forced. James starts the story thus: It was in the reign of one of the Georges - it does not matter which, though perhaps the reader may discover in the course of this history (in fact, a later reference to 1809 excised the first two monarchs with that name). After all, what does it signify in what king's reign an event happened? Fair point - usually. But the author than repeats the point twice more in the next couple of pages. Then, he immediately pontificates on the difference between April and May and the changeable weather. We don't get to the relevance of a horseman of six or seven-and-twenty years of age - after comments on his horse's and his own behaviour - until page fourteen. I found that, although I already knew the author's predilection for purple passages and semi-philosophical asides, on this occasion they rather grated. This is the downside of the three-decker novel, and can be found in nearly all the writers forced into that straightjacket - including Sir Walter Scott. James, to his credit, knew it: Heaven and earth, what a ramble I have taken! but I will go back again gently by a path across the fields.
There are, though, some bon mots or, rather, paragraphs. The past is a tomb. There let events, as well as men, sleep in peace. Foul befall him who disturbs them...History is but a great museum of osteology, where the skeletons of great deeds are preserved without muscles - here a tall fact and there a short one; some sadly dismembered, and all crumbling with age, and covered with dust and cobwebs.