Tuesday, 26 March 2024
Frank Curzon Britten's 'Sir Roland Preederoy' 1909
Escott Lynn's 'Under the Red Rose' 1905
Escott Lynn is an author who is very hard to track down. Apparently it was the pseudonym of Christopher George Holman Lawrence, In the Three Jolly Cadets: a Tale of the Royal Military Academy (W & R Chambers, 1931), he inscribed it "for my nephew Richard Lawrence 'bill' from his uncle escott lynn". He used several other names for his works, including Jackspur, Lawrence Abbott and Captain W.C. Metcalfe. Books before the Great War included: For Bonnie Prince Charlie (1910), Blair of Balaclava. A hero of the Light Brigade (1911) and A Cavalier of Fortune (1912). He spent many years as a volunteer in the armed forces and several of his books are war related, such as: Oliver Hastings VC 91916), Tommy of the Tanks (1919) and Last of the Lothians; with the Royal Scots at Gallipoli (1920). He was born in 1866 and died in 1950.
As the title - Under the Red Rose - suggests, this story is very much a Lancastrian one. The hero is a youth of 17, Guy Talbot, who is in the household of Lord Rivers at Ludlow. It is April 1483, and Edward IV's reign is drawing to an end. Guy is served by a faithful retainer, Martin. Their home is in the south-eastern corner of Herefordshire. The two are out riding, when a haughty, bombastic man appears, followed by a swart cross-eyed, heavily built man wearing a steel cap and a brigandine over a leathern jerkin. They are Sir Fulke Bourchier and his henchman Roger, travelling on the king's business to Ludlow Castle, which they must reach at the earliest instant. They clash and Martin cries: "Go; we care nothing for your Yorkist king here..." Thus commences an enmity which last throughout the novel. Guy and Martin carry on to an old priory where they know the prior well. He has a distinguished visitor - none other than the Bishop of Ely. The latter counsels Guy to be ready to defend Edward, the young Prince of Wales, and gives him a ring as a passport to the Bishop's confidence in future.
Guy and Martin continue to Combe Hall, the Talbots' mansion. Guy's father has been abroad for the past two years (and it soon becomes apparent that he is in the service of Henry Tudor.) Not only is his father at home with his wife Dame Talbot and their daughter Hilda, but so is Sir Fulke. Moreover, also there is Isabel Bray, in Margaret Beaufort, Countess of Richmond's household. A goblet is brought to the dining table - it has a chasing a lion passant crowned, the device of Lord Lisle, said to have been slain at Barnet fighting against King Edward. Cunning Sir Fulke puts two and two together, much more quickly than most of the readers. From then on the Talbots are under suspicion. Guy and Martin travel to Ludlow and the former then reconnects with Rivers and Prince Edward, a slim, handsome boy of thirteen, with golden curls reaching to his shoulders. By now, we know that his father is dead and Guy reaffirms his oath to protect the new monarch.
We first hear of the Duke of Gloucester, when his promise arrives to guard his nephew with his life. "I love not my uncle Gloucester; his smile freezes my blood. I will not trust myself with him", says the perspicacious youth. The story then follows the well-known chronology. Rivers and King Edward V journey to London, get near to Northampton, but hear that Richard awaits them there. They press on to Stony Stratford. Guy witnesses everything, by now with his friend Will Dysart. Throughout the novel Guy comes across as rather naive and headstrong, Will much more cautious, but acute and sensible. The two young men now meet Gloucester, who was short, remarkably so...he was slightly though gracefully formed, with a hardly perceptible inequality in the height of his shoulders - hence, among his enemies, the nickname of "Crookback"...his eyes were small and almost closed, his lips were thin, and his manner was nervous and impatient. The Duke of Buckingham is with him - a tall, stout, insipid-looking man, whose looks bespoke him what he was - a pompous, shallow-minded coxcomb...
Sir Fulke keeps trying to incarcerate Guy and Will, but it is here that a Carmelite friar first appears, and keeps appearing, to help them in their need. We later find out that he is Sir Christopher Urswick, a loyal Tudor supporter. employed by the Bishop of Ely. Rivers, Sir Richard Grey and others are imprisoned and Gloucester takes charge of the young king. Guy speeds ahead to London to warn Queen Elizabeth of the turn in events. The author describes her well: she had in her day possessed much beauty of a certain insipid kind, and even then was quite passable-looking, but the tremulous lips betrayed a weak, vacillating nature; and her arrogant air, as well as the many acts of her life, proved that she possessed a greed and avarice that there seemed no satisfying. Guy is attacked yet again in London but recovers to witness Gloucester's moves against Hastings, Ely and the others at the Tower. He makes a friend of Hastings only to see his execution on Tower Green. The tale follows the More/Shakespeare version of events, strawberries, withered arm and all.
Taken prisoner, on the orders of Sir Fulke, and placed in one of the Tower's dungeons, Guy is spirited away to Brecknock Castle, where the Bishop of Ely is slowly working his wiles on the Duke of Buckingham. Guy once again allows his rather stupid headstrong behaviour to spoil the bishop's plans for his release. Luckily, better judgement prevails and he escapes with the bishop himself, thanks to Will Dysart's involvement. More twists in Guy's story continue, including him seeing the two dead princes in the Tower before they are buried. No wonder the Chapter is called Richard's Foulest Deed. Guy and Will get involved, with Sir John Cheney, in the disastrous Buckingham Rebellion, Will flees abroad to Brittany, whilst Guy and Sir John try to raise support in the North. Guy is captured for the umpteenth time, and is brought before King Richard. Headstrong as ever, he challenges the king: "I count it no treason to act against one who is but a usurper...I will tell you of the punishment of Heaven. You, who slew your brother's children, who murdered Rivers and Hastings...", and is able to tell Richard that his own son is dead! Amazingly, Guy escapes from Nottingham Castle, meets up with the faithful Martin, gets to King's Lynn, finds the Bishop of Ely, and they take ship for Vannes. Here Christopher Urswick joins them, and they link up with Sir John Cheney and Guy's father. And, finally, Henry of Richmond. It is Guy, of course, who holds a bridge so that Henry can escape to France. The boy is simply everywhere! He is at Bosworth, but not before he has met up with Isobel Bray and realises he loves her. Will kills King Richard's henchman, Ratcliffe; Guy is involved in the end of Sir Fulke and is responsible for sending Richard's helmet flying.
Escott Lynn has quite cleverly wrapped the story of a fictitious youth around the exciting events of April 1483 to August 1485. Perhaps Guy is too ubiquitous, seemingly at hand at just the right time to witness all. The Epilogue, a year later, sees Elizabeth of York sharing the throne with Henry; Bishop Morton is Archbishop of Canterbury, the Stanleys and Sir John Cheney are of the Council; Lord and Lady Lisle (yes - they are Guy's parents) are at their rightful home of Sudely Castle; and Sir Guy Talbot walks hand in hand with Isabel Bray, and Sir William Dysart with Hilda Talbot.
In the Notes, at the end of the book, Escott Lynn discusses Richard III's character, using the works of Sir Thomas More, Edmund Hall, and James Gairdner.
L.F. Winter's 'Castle Harcourt; or, The Days of King Richard the Third' 1825
Sunday, 10 March 2024
John Reed Scott's 'Beatrix of Clare' 1907
John Reed Scott (born Gettysbury, Pennsylvania 8 September 1869; died Westminster, Maryland, 21 January 1942) was a lawyer and author of several books, possibly the best known being The Colonel of the Red Huzzars. This tale, set in 1483, is essentially a love story wrapped around the momentous events between Edward IV's demise and the Duke of Buckingham's rebellion. After the last few pro-Lancastrian stories, it was a refreshing change to encounter a positive character study of Richard, Duke of Gloucester then King.
Richard's overall portrayal is that of a kind but formidable Plantagenet - clearly in love with Anne, his wife, and whose love is returned in full. His approach to Beatrix of Clare and Sir Aymer de Lacy is almost avuncular but to a rebel such as Buckingham or the fictitious Lord Darby cold and unforgiving. We first meet him in Pontefract Castle: the pale, clean-shaven face, with its beautiful mouth and straight Norman nose, and the short, slender figure in its mantle and doublet of black velvet furred with ermine...and dark brown hair hanging bushy to the shoulders, would have been effeminate but for the massively majestic forehead and the fierce black eyes - brilliant, compelling, stern, proud - that flashed forth the mighty soul within...Richard had been famed for his wisdom and statecraft...while his royal brother was dallying in a life of indulgence amid the dissipations of his Court, the brave and resolute Richard was leading his armies, administering his governments, and preserving order on the Marches of the Border. No mention of any deformity or involvement in previous murders. Later in the book, the author again sings Richard's praises: he wore no armour, but in his rich doublet and super-tunic of dark blue velvet with the baudikin stripes on the sleeve, he made as handsome and gallant a figure as one was wont to see, even in those days of chivalry. And no reign, since his protonymic predecessor's, gave promise of a brighter future...England had known Richard of Gloucester, even since his boyhood, as a strong man among strong men - a puissant knight, an unbeaten general, a wise counsellor, a brilliant administrator; in all things able, resourceful, proficient; combining, as it were, in the last of the Angevines, all the keen statesmanship, stern will, and fiery dash of the great House that had ruled England for three hundred turbulent years. And, rather amazingly, he is as shocked as anyone to be told that the Princes in the Tower were dead. On it being suggested that Edward killed Richard and himself. He had lately been oppressed with heavy melancholy, King Richard replies, "yes, that is doubtless the solution, yet scant credence will be given it. To the Kingdom it will be murder foul...Richard, you were a good seer.
The hero, Sir Aymer de Lacy, has returned to England after a spell abroad. He is making his way north from Windsor to beg service in Gloucester's when he is attacked and robbed by outlaws. Wounded, he is found by a slender figure in green velvet - the sweet, bow-shaped mouth, the high-bred, sensitive nose, the rounded chin, the tiny ear, the soft, deep grey eyes, and crowning all, the great rolls of the auburn hair that sunbeams spin to gold. He can't help but be smitten and falls headlong in immediate love! She departs, without him finding out her name. A little later, on Edward IV's death, de Lacy is sent by the Duke of Buckingham (whom he had met some years previously in Paris) with a message to Richard at Pontefract. From then onwards, he is intimately bound up with the fast-moving events of that summer and autumn of 1483. At Pontefract he not only meets Anne Neville, but Beatrix de Beaumont, in her own right Countess of Clare. He finds he has a rival also enamoured with her: Lord Darby (not to be confused with the real Lord Derby) is determined to wed her, by fair means or foul. It is to be very foul as, in league with the duplicitous Cistercian Aldam, Abbot of Kirkstall - an intriguing, political priest of Lancastrian inclination - he has her kidnapped and inured in his castle at Roxford. Lord Darby and the Abbot are both enmeshed in Buckingham's Rebellion. Thanks to the support of the older Sir John de Bury of Craigston Castle, Beatrix's uncle, de Lacy rescues Beatrix from the castle. She finally agrees to marry him, he will become Earl of Clare, and they will live happily ever after. Or do they, as Scott's story ends in 1483?
There maybe occasionally touches of a Mills & Boon, or Robert Hale, romance about the tale, but the author draws the reader in well and one begins to care about the result. De Lacy follows the Duke of Gloucester to London; is present when Rivers and Grey are seized and Edward V is escorted south; witnesses the famous Council at the Tower of London, when Hastings is taken out to be executed. Thomas, Lord Stanley is duly assessed: His countenance was peculiar, for in it there was both cunning and frankness; cunning in the eyes, frankness in the mouth and chin; a face, withal, that would bear constant watching, and that contained scarce a trace of virility - only a keen selfishness and a crafty faithlessness...with that cool indifference to aught but expediency which characterized his whole life...whilst the Duke of Buckingham, according to King Richard, has no statecraft in him and can learn none
Scott writes persuasively - there are compelling accounts of the [in]famous Council Meeting in the Tower; of the Kirkstall abbot's Chapter House meeting; of Buckingham's final moments at Salisbury; and Lord Darby's unmasking in front of King Richard at the end of the tale. Having recently read some rather juvenile books - to be fair, deliberately so - I enjoyed John Reed Scott's account of the intrigues of those Yorkist days. His characters were well-fleshed out; the pace of the narrative was admirable and sustained; and the atmosphere of the late fifteenth-century was realistically conveyed.
Thursday, 7 March 2024
H. Elrington's 'The Luck of Chervil' 1907
Friday, 1 March 2024
J.E. Preston Muddock's 'Jane Shore' 1905
I simply had to research an author with such a splendid name. Muddock (1843-1934) was a prolific British journalist and author of horror and mystery fiction. Between 1889 and 1922, he published nearly 300 detective and mystery stories. He also wrote under the names of Joyce Emmerson Preston Muddock and Dick Donovan. Most of Muddock's stories featured this continuing character, Dick Donovan, the Glasgow Detective, named after one of the 18th century Bow Street Runners. The character was so popular that the later stories were published under his name. Son of a sea captain, during his youth and career Muddock travelled to India, China, Australia and America. By 1870, he had started publishing serial stories in English newspapers. He married three times - in 1861, 1871 and 1880 - with ten children who survived infancy. One daughter changed her name to Eva Mudocci and became the mistress of the Expressionist painter Edvard Munch. Three of Muddock's sons fell in the Great War.
Although, obviously, the tale revolves around the same woman, Muddock's approach is very different from that of Mrs Bennetts' 'Jane Shore' (see my Blog of 30th December 2023). Here the long-suffering husband, Matthew Shore takes more of a centre stage. Fully alive to the prospect of losing Jane to other, more powerful men, he manages to effect their marriage, but is overheard slandering the king and the Yorkists. Arrested, he is set free in exchange for his wife becoming Edward IV's paramour. Bitter hatred now leads to a prominent role in opposing Edward (for the Usurper Edward I have naught but contempt). Caught again, he escapes - from the Jaws of Death - from the Tower yet again, thanks to Jane. I wondered whether the author was ever a Freemason, as the Secret League he joins supporting Henry VI and the Lancastrians has a very similar set of passwords and initiation questions and answers. The scenes in the Tower, with Matthew's torture and confession contain some of the best of Muddock's writing. Muddock's tale ends with Shore and his wife escaping to Wales - he to die a year later from an illness, she to enter a nunnery!
Jane is Jane Wainstead, daughter of Thomas, a mercer of good repute and business in Cheapside. It is he, rather than his wife, who wishes for a good marriage for his daughter. Thus, Mrs Bennett's opinion is reversed. Jane is the same character, but more in love with her husband and genuinely conscience-stricken when the King forces her to become his mistress in return for saving her husband's life. Throughout the book, Jane is portrayed as a women of good character, forced to do things she didn't really want to do and, ultimately, loyal to her husband.
William Hastings plays a major role in the story; first, on more than one occasion trying to seduce Jane (including an attempted abduction). Muddock's opinion is that to ladies he was the most courteous of chevaliers, but his insincerity was proverbial... a dangerous gallant. He has a veritable passion for Jane. Secondly, he is instrumental is ensuring Matthew Shore escapes from the Tower.
As for Richard of Gloucester, he is portrayed as a malign character from the first: there was something unpleasant in his face, a something that repelled. The author has a novel explanation for his hatred of Jane. It is not the usual dislike of her strumpet-like behaviour, but because he is repelled by her when he tried to seduce her himself! Moreover, when she has to tell the king, Gloucester gets a humiliating dressing down! The Duke rose to his feet. His face was pale. There was a perceptible quiver on his lip, and that peculiar, deep, furtive and cunning expression of the eyes which was so characteristic of the Duke of Gloucester, and so fraught with danger to his enemies, showed itself. As his years increased this expression became more marked, and it undoubtedly indicated his savage and ferocious nature. For savage and ferocious he was, and against those whom he disliked he seemed capable of any cruelty...he never forgave the insult to his pride when she refused his caresses, and brought upon him his Royal brother's reprimand. The Duke was a terrible hater, and never forgave his enemies...he was a man of a singularly cunning nature, in which selfishness and ambition were overmastering traits. He possessed not an atom of real reverence or religion, and the fact that he was to some extent deformed soured and embittered him... Edward IV, on his death bed, warns Hastings, watch well my brother, the Duke of Gloucester. He is subtle and full of evil. For every move he makes make you a counter move. Someone even worse was Richard's sidekick, Catesby.
Muddock reveals that he used the Paston Letters (Knight's edition) and referred to Sir Thomas More as the historian.
My copy has a pasted-in printed note on the flyleaf: from the Jane Shore Collection of James L. Harner, this being Copy 3. One wonders how many other books Mr Harner had on Jane.