Monday, 26 May 2025

John Grisham's 'The Last Juror' 2004

 

Penguin paperback edition -2023

Before I started this Review, I did something I rarely do - I looked up the book on Amazon and read the 3* reviews there. I am afraid that they all made more or less the same points - and I find myself in agreement with them! Here are some extracts:

O.K., but not wonderful. Boring after Part 1...went downhill with just rubbish of town and school football matches...found it hard work...over long and rather laboured...got a bit tedious...a very good start but the centre of the story wallows in unnecessary  material...pedestrian story line told without conviction...lost its way...

Oh dear - but I concur. If I was being just negative, I would say this was a pot boiler by an author who was still writing interesting, free-flowing stories with plenty of realistic characters, but on this occasion hadn't plotted very well.  Part One certainly stands up to scrutiny, telling the tale of the gruesome rape and murder of a mother of two very young children by a young man, Danny Padgitt, from a notorious local family engaged in multiple criminal activities. They seemingly have the local law and other officials in their pockets (usually through hefty cash handouts and/or brutal intimidation).  This first part takes the story from page 3 to page 248 - half the book's length - and could even stand alone, with an 'unfinished business' ending. Grisham is on top form here and his cast of characters are thoroughly realistic and the tension is slowly built up in a professional way.

If the reader had then skipped to page 353 (Part Three), which deals with Danny Padgitt's release, after less than ten years served (of a 'life' sentence) - thanks to more behind-the-scenes corruption - then we could have puzzled over yet two more murders and reached the satisfying, if slightly unlikely, twist at the end. That would have cut the novel down to a more manageable and tighter story of just under 400 pages. As it is, the massive 504 pages have palled long before the end. For once, it is not the bread in the sandwich, but the 'meat' in the middle which is the problem.

Part Two simply meanders and one is never quite sure of the point of several of the byways. Does Grisham want to focus on the undoubted horror of the near apartheid behaviour of so many whites in the south of the USA in the 1970s? Does he want to analyse the different dogmas and churches that make up 'Protestantism'? Does he want to concentrate on the few characters surrounding the young newspaper proprietor, Joyner William Traynor (soon to be shorted to 'Willie'), and make it also a psychological appraisal of the latter? Frankly the various strands don't really mesh and one could even argue that much of these hundred pages are 'padding'. A pity, as there is the usual Grisham experienced take on the motives of jurors, corruption in high and middle places, and the power of increasing affection (this time between black and white).

Thursday, 22 May 2025

Peter Brent's 'Black Nile. Mungo Park and the Search for the Niger' 1977

 

Gordon Cremonesi first edition -  1977

From the fanaticism of Savonarola to that of Mungo Park - two books about obsessives; but very different in intent. The former was all about the purified soul (which did lead him into political storms), the latter about physical endurance and the desire to 'know'. Park was a Lowland Scot, born on 10th September 1771, the third son and seventh child of an industrious farmer. Schooled at Selkirk Grammar School, he went up in 1789 to Edinburgh University to continue medical studies. He travelled down to London in 1791 and met, through his brother-in-law James Dickson, Sir Joseph Banks, President of the Royal Society and the leading light in the African Association. The group's interest came to focus on West Africa - the land mass south of the Sahara and north of the Kalahari remained almost totally mysterious. Stories of imperial organisation and steady trade mingled with rumours of religious sacrifices, cannibalism, feud, revolt, Islamic intransigence and tyrannous cruelties. Above all, there was the mystery of the Niger. Previous explorers, such as Major Houghton, had died trying to solve the river's mystery. On 23rd July 1794, a two-man committee of the African Association passed a resolution: That Mr. Mungo Park having offered his Services to the Association as a Geographical Missionary to the interior countries of Africa; and appearing to the Committee to be well qualified for the Undertaking, his offer be accepted.

On 21st June 1795, Park was on the Endeavour when it dropped anchor in the Gambia estuary. The next six chapters deal with the myriad of trials and tribulations he faced, before he landed back at Falmouth on 22nd December 1797. The author makes a pretty good stab at describing the ordeals that Park faced (using as his main source Park's Journal of a Mission to the Interior Parts of Africa, published in 1815) - hunger, sickness, capture by native kings and often facing potential death, beset by Islamic fundamentalism. The man must have had almost superhuman fortitude. He did get to the Niger - near Segu (I found the frontispiece map virtually useless, the biggest debit concerning the book) - I saw with infinite pleasure the great object of my mission - the long sought for majestic Niger, glittering to the morning sun, as broad as the Thames at Westminster, and flowing slowly to the eastward...I lifted up my fervent thanks in prayer to the Great Ruler of all things, for having thus far crowned my endeavours with success. But he had to turn back, still some 250 miles upriver from Timbuctu, another of his aims. The weather had turned and he had virtually nothing left to keep him going. Hostility surrounded him as he made his return.

On his return, he gave his Report to Banks and the African Association, journeyed to Scotland, where he married Alice (Ailie) Anderson on 2nd August 1799. For two years, Park 'vanishes'. He makes friends with Professor Adam Ferguson, Dugald Stewart and Sir Walter Scott. But he is restless, finding his work as a country doctor monotonous. Banks and others had not given up on their dream and by May 1804, Park was convinced he would be returning to Scotland, notwithstanding a wife and by now three children. This second voyage would be very different from the first. What had been a private venture financed by gentlemen, patriotic certainly, but curious above all, had now become an act of state. The France of Napoleon was considered a danger not just in the Channel but everywhere. Britain must 'win' in West Africa!

On 27th April 1805, Park set off again for the Niger, this time with soldiers and others. Now he travelled like a seigneur, a sort of nobleman, with outriders, guides, servants, guards; an entourage. He came like a plenipotentiary, a representative of power, uniforms and muskets behind him; he came, in fact, like a conqueror. The story is one of death, as the band gradually diminished. Nothing would stop Mungo Park now except his own death; every other man in his company might fall or desert, might buckle and collapse and, sweating, die, but he would continue, inexorably committed to what had become the single, particular purpose of his life.  But, by the time he reached the Niger again, (taking 16 weeks, not the planned six), three-quarters of his soldiers had died. Only five were left to make the attempt to follow the Niger's  course; 44 men had marched, happy, indifferent or drunk, from the Gambia estuary eight months before. And then they were down to two. Was it his single-mindedness that finally destroyed Park? Was it his determination not to stop that aroused legitimate hostility in those who lived, at least in part, off the duty they levied from river traffic? The manner of Park's death is still argued over today; that it happened is the only sure fact. The author suggests he died after jumping into the river from his canoe, to escape the hostile natives on the shore. We simply don't know. The news was received by Banks in 1810.

The two key chapters which convey best the author's attitude to Western (white) imperialism are 6. A Necessary Reappraisal and 13. The Colonial Consequence. Here are some extracts from them.

It seems to me that the story of European exploration, particularly in Africa and Asia, was based on a single monstrous assumption: that reality is limited by the powers of Western observation. What the black man or the brown man may have seen, the native of the country and perfectly clear in his witness, was taken to have no validity. An "explorer" was needed, a white man, a stranger - by no means always trained in the skills and technology of scientific observation - whole verification alone could bring this or that natural phenomenon into the orbit of what truly existed.

It was rarely the explorers (Burton was a major exception, as was Stanley, and the unspeakable Speke) who found the men and women among whom they travelled negligible, certainly not until the senseless patriotism and racial self-satisfaction that afflicted whites in the second half of the nineteenth century.

It was not the simple morality of fire-power that persuaded the Western nations of their right to colonise: it was their collective conviction of racial superiority.

Thus we come back to Mungo Park. For in the great body of Africa he was the first, the earliest of those magnificent travellers who, criss-crossing the continent, put on it the stamp of European ownership. In their wake came the men with Bibles and the men with guns, the traders, the educators, the administrators, the whole gallery of exploiters intent on shaping what they found either in their own image or for their own needs. And, of them all, Mungo Park was the first...it is he who carries with him, who represents, that overwhelming Western passion - the desire to know.

Mungo Park carried with him the whole gallery of ideological arrogance and careless self-indulgence that was to mark so much of Europe's dealings with the world.

Explorers were, of course, not typical at all, but rather eccentric, single-minded almost to madness, their ambition often built upon an implacability so extreme that in almost any other context it must have seemed unbearable. They were a tiny and obsessed group, survivors through diplomacy and toughness, their curiosity both meticulous and insatiable.

There was another element in Mungo Park...a romantic heat deep below the controlled surface...it was in this private element, surely, that the roots of his obsession with the Niger lay. He had, one senses, personalised his struggle with that great river. Its secret was its treasure, its own length the guardian dragon, he the knight who would filch that gold and carry it home. Only death would prevent his success. In the end [that passion] overwhelmed him. It drew him from his wife and children, it hurried him on through sickness and disaster, it drove him out on that river in a patched-up canoe with only the tattered remnants of his party about him. Finally, it killed him.

Mungo Park (1771-1806)

Monday, 19 May 2025

Michael de la Bedoyere's 'The Meddlesome Friar' 1957

Collins first edition - 1957

 I have had this book for more years than I can remember, but never read it until I took it on our trip to Tuscany and Florence ten days ago. Visiting the Chiesa San Marco, where Savonarola often preached, and standing in the Piazza della Signoria near the spot where his Bonfires of the Vanities occurred and where he soon after met his own death, gave added poignancy to my reading.

Half way through the book, I had to look up information about the author, Michael de la Bedoyere (1900-1973). I can't say I was surprised to read that he had been educated at Stonyhurst College, had planned to become a Jesuit priest, became editor of the Catholic Herold (1934-1962) and written a biography of St Francis of Assisi (1962).  In other words, a Roman Catholic to his core. It was mildly worrying that he had supported General Franco during the Spanish Civil War. De la Bedoyere almost bends over backwards to put the best possible angle on both Savonarola and the other extraordinary, and opposing, figure - Pope Alexander (Borgia) VI. In his Introduction, he does posit the questions - Was Alexander Borgia as bad as he has been painted? Was Savonarola justified in his holy defiance of the bad pope, and consequently was he as good as he seems?  My (Protestant skewed) answer is Yes, yes and no! It is almost impossible in this godless 21st century, to understand, let alone sympathise with, the religious fanaticism of the Friar, who hurtled pel mell towards his gruesome death.


Born in the self-governing city of Ferrara in 1452, one of four brothers and two sisters, Girolamo Savonarola was a solitary and melancholy boy. By the age of twenty, the path of his future life was well marked - not only would he seek sanctuary, but the passion within him for it must burst sooner or later into ardent expression. Moved by a sermon he heard, he ran away as a pilgrim to Bologna to join the black and white friars of his beloved Aquinas. Early letters to his mother included phrases such as, God flays his children lest they derive hope from earthly things...give yourself over to solitude, spiritual reading and prayer. Hardly a bundle of laughs in the local inn. His superiors sent him on missions to various towns of Northern Italy. The critical sermon of his life, after mainly failures, was preached at San Gimignano, near Siena. He prophesied that (1) the Church should be scourged; (2) that it should afterwards be renewed; and (3) that this should happen soon. His growing fame led Lorenzo de' Medici, ironically, to write to the General of the Dominicans asking that Savonarola be sent to San Marco in Florence. Little by little his audience grew, until he found it necessary to move to the church of San Marco on 1st August, 1489.

Many began to see him as a heaven-sent prophet. From San Marco he moved to the cathedral itself in the Lent of 1491. "Reflect carefully, those of you who are rich, for your punishment will come. Not Florence shall be the name of this city: it will be called but a den of thieves, of vice, of blood." And still they supported him! In 1491, he was elected Prior of San Marco. Lorenzo died; Ferrante of Naples died; Innocent VIII died. All, apparently prophesied by Savonarola. Cardinal Rodrigo Borgia was elected Alexander VI. The author entitles his Part Two: Clash and Martyrdom. It was inevitable that the increasingly fanatical Friar should clash with the worldly, back-sliding pope.

...whenever I went up into the pulpit again, I was unable to contain myself. I could do no other. To speak the Lord's words has been for me a burning fire within my bones and heart. It was unbearable. I could not but speak. I was on fire. I was alight with the spirit of the Lord... (part of his last Sermon in Florence cathedral). Over the next few years, Savonarola, becoming more powerful from his pulpit in Florence, preached ever more fiery sermons against the Church and, in particular, the state of the papacy and Rome. He was in many ways a precursor of Luther and other Protestant leaders, but the difference was he remained wedded to Roman Catholicism. 

In one of his Lenten sermons, he was more vehement than ever: You (the Church) have become a shameless harlot in your lusts. Once you were ashamed of your sins; now you are shameless...O prostitute Church, you have displayed your foulness to the whole world, and you stink to high heaven...

The Church is chock-full of abominations from the head to the souls of the feet, but you do nothing to cure the evil, being content to worship the cause of the evil which defiles it. The Lord is therefore angry and for some time past has left the Church without a Shepherd. I solemnly declare to you in the word of the Lord that this man, Alexander, is no Pope and cannot be held as such...I affirm that he is not even a Christian and that he does believe God to exist, and this scales the height of all faithlessness. (Letter to Kings of France, England, Spain and Hungary)

Though he avoided working out a theology of his position, his attitude amounted in practice to holding that no authority and power can be legitimate, either in Church or State, in the case of anyone who is not in a state of grace, who has not charity, who is not among the saints. He could not last. De La Bedoyere states that Alexander did not at first wish to destroy the Friar, but his patience finally ran out. In February 1498, Savonarola was excommunicated. Swift penalties followed. With two other friars, Fra Silvestro of Florence and Fra Domenico of Pescia, they were condemned to be hanged by a rope and their bodies burnt, that the soul may be separated from the body, in public in and on the Piazza of their high lordships. On 24th May 1498, this sentence was carried out; some of Savonarola's followers succeeded in cheating the authorities who had ordered the ashes to be thrown into the Arno. They gathered together relics of a prophet and a hero. Alexander Borgia died in Rome five years later, his blackened body, hideously corrupted, with his swollen tongue hanging out of his mouth. Divine justice? The Evil of his damned soul? Or just the result of the dangerous heat of a high Roman summer?

Thursday, 15 May 2025

Alec Marsh's 'Cut and Run' 2024

Sharpe Books first paperback edition - 2024

 Alec Marsh's novel - the first in a possible series featuring Frank Champion, an invalided out Great War soldier - is the author's best so far. We first meet Frank on the dried-out waterfront at Wivenhoe - on the Essex coast - where the boats lay askew, their masts and idle rigging a confused bird's nest against the cold white sky. Unloading his meagre catch from his boat, the Nancy, he makes his way to the wall of heat and the drum roll of male voices in the local inn, the Rose and Crown. Catching sight of himself in a broken mirror on the wall, he sees the weary, cold eyes of a stranger staring back. I took another slug of the whisky and felt better...my beard was a disgrace - like the hedge of an abandoned house, and dark fish blood streaked my cheeks. When you add the missing lobe of his scarred left ear and the angry cut on his cheek, then clearly Champion has been in the wars, and 'Downbeat' hardly describes the start of the tale! 

Then, an old acquaintance from East Africa, Nathanial Kennedy, appears as Champion makes his way back to the waterfront. It's not good news. Kennedy, now sporting three pips on his army uniform, has a mission - to persuade Champion to return to France. "A young woman was murdered in Béthune last Monday. She was a prostitute. Her body was left in the bandstand in the town's main park. Her throat had been cut...She was twenty." She had worked in the Blue Lamp (the unofficial name given to the brothel for British Army officers; the Red Lamp was frequented by 'other ranks'), so, by implication, it was a British Army officer who was responsible for her murder. Although the last thing Champion wanted to do was return to France, he caves in: "All right. I'll do it." 

 Thus begins a convoluted tale of sexual depravity and skulduggery in high places, sustained by a cast of well-drawn characters, a vibrant sense of time and place which makes it plain that the author has done considerable research on the milieu of Great War of 1916. He has read Alan Clark's The Donkeys, Robert Graves's Goodbye to All That and Lyn Macdonald's 1915: The Death of Innocence, amongst other captivating source material and has successfully immersed himself in the cataclysmic events of the period. The use of the first person singular - which sometimes inhibits the breadth of the canvas - is here particularly effective, as it ensures the sense of immediacy throughout. We see and feel each unveiling of the tale through Champion's eyes.

We meet, with Champion, Madame Lefebvre, proprietress of the Blue Lamp, whose slight overbite gave the impression that she was endeavouring to retain a large boiled sweet in her mouth; Monsieur Chambord, the shady local Mayor of Béthune, who brought the fragrant smell of roasted meat with him, and whose eyes behind the wire spectacles were far from genial; the harassed Police Inspector Catouillart, whose face was dominated by a broad dark moustache that concluded with points like the curved talons of a bird of prey. The chin was lost to a vast waxed tuft, streaked with white, which could also be seen in the long hair that was swept back from the thick, chalky face. This hard-featured Velazquez conquistador... Excellent!; the Eagle, proprietor of the Red Lamp and whose head was tattooed with an image that changed its attitude constantly as the man ate and the sides of his scalp swelled and contracted with his robust mastication.; Bernard Robecq, owner of the Blue Lamp and a thorough-going bastardo; the French General, a Chevalier of the Order of the Legion of Honour, Maximilian Troyon and the English General Risborough also have major parts to play in the unwrapping of the mystery. More I cannot divulge; suffice it to say that all the characters are believable. 

Before Champion has got to grips with the first death, another prostitute, who he has recently talked to, is murdered; a butcher's wife has been aptly slaughtered with a meat cleaver and her British army officer lover, Captain R. Bradbury, seemingly committed suicide. Meanwhile, another prostitute is missing, apart from her arm, recognisable due to a chopped off finger! Very mucky. Champion's pursuit of the truth sees him travel to the very Front (in fact, a return to the horrors from which he had barely escaped with his life the previous year). The chapter dealing with this contains some of the best writing in the novel.

Champion, to his utmost credit, keeps going in pursuit of the truth, which leads to at least one surprise for this reader. Alec Marsh keeps a tight hold on the narrative and on his characters throughout; his writing is taut but free flowing. He does like his similes!