My 'interest' in nuns started long before I read Eileen Power's seminal (seminarial?) work. Unlike male monasteries, not many nunneries/female priories survive to any great extent ((even Lacock Abbey, in Wiltshire, has been 'transformed' into a mansion in the 16th and mid-18th centuries, although the retained cloisters are superb), so my youthful meanderings around Britain was spent amongst the ruins of castles and monkish abodes. My Tudors and Stuarts A Level course similarly concentrated on the monks at the Dissolution (as did David Knowles in his important surveys). However, on 28th October 1969, I bought Josephine Bell's Tudor Pilgrimage in the Fontana paperback edition, published the same year. The story of the nine inmates at the fictional St. Mary's Priory at Silfelde-on-Loddon, and their ejection into the turbulent world of the monstrous Henry VIII, is one that I have gone back to on several occasions. I quote from the back of the paperback: Dame Isobel, accused of treason against the King, finds herself the quarry of a witch-hunt; Dame Margery, mis-shapen and feeble-minded, stumbles upon a band of merciless tormentors; Elynor Snow, a reluctant novice, takes to the road with Thomas, the Priory gardener, posing as his wife; Elizabeth Tylney comes face to face with...a man she loved, desired - and feared. Great story - it captured me! I bought the first edition many years later.
Tuesday, 6 October 2020
Further Thoughts on Nuns
Eileen Power and Medieval Nunneries
I recently bought a fine copy of Eileen Power's Medieval People in a first printing Penguin, in its dust wrapper. Published in Pelican Books in 1937 as number A19, it had a very heart-warming quotation from Charles Lamb on the title page: 'I counsel thee, shut not thy heart nor thy library'. I also have a copy of the first hardback edition, published by Methuen & Co. in 1924 (alas, without a dust wrapper).
Thursday, 24 September 2020
From Trollope to Gide II
Penguin 1st printing - 1960 Penguin 1st printing - 1952
I read The Immoralist (1902) nearly at one sitting in Salisbury. What I knew about Gide was really only the blurb on the back of the Penguin. His dates, 1869 to 1951, took in the Third (1870-1940) and Fourth Republics (1946-1958), with the 'gap' for the Second World War. After an irregular and lonely upbringing, he emerged, by 1917, as a prophet to French youth - his unorthodox views were a source of endless debate and attack. He married his cousin in 1892... The book apparently sold only 200-odd copies in the first few years after its publication; thus, if there was a 'scandal' about its contents it must have been limited. Gide, in his Preface, says I intended to make this book as little an indictment as an apology and took care to pass no judgement. However, his protagonist, Michel - who recounts his marriage to Marceline; his suffering from tuberculosis;, his recovery aided by his fascination with young Arab boys' bodies; his wife succumbing to the same illness but dying partly through his own selfish and hedonistic neglect of her - surely has the novelist more on his wavelength than against.
A 1995 critic argued that the book, it would not be entirely unfair to say, is the story of a man whose discovery that he is a pederast transforms him from a prematurely dried-up bookworm into a passionate lover of life. I found reading the novel compelling but threatening, even repellant, in its totally hedonistic self-centredness. As another critic has written, Michel is trying to seduce and convince us...he doesn't so much challenge us as suggest that we might feel the same.
Strangely, Strait is the Gate (1909, although the first novel he wrote) 'troubled' me more. Set mainly in Normandy, it is the story of cousins Jerome and Alissa who, aged 10 and 12 respectively, make a commitment of undying love for each other. Alissa is witness to her mother's infidelity and develops, through religiosity, a barrier to human love. Perversely, she keeps Jerome 'hanging on' and we are drawn in to a deeply sad, even tragic, story. The title comes from St. Luke's strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto to you, will seek to enter in, and shall not be able. Taking Pascal's What is not God cannot satisfy my longing and adding the feeling that their love can only be an impediment to Virtue, Alissa rejects Jerome again and again. Only when she dies at the end, with the reading of sections of her Journal which she allowed to survive, does Jerome fully comprehend her behaviour. I read it is a romantic story of doomed love. I could see little romance in her monstrous virtue and felt less sympathy that I should for her almost self-imposed death. In practice, her behaviour is as self-centred, even as cruel, as Michel's in the previous book. Immoralism versus Moralism! If only, Jerome had turned to the more straightforward love of Alissa's younger sister, Juliette, who clearly still loves him as the story closes - another impossible romance.
Between these two novels I read Gide's The Vatican Cellars (1914).
From Trollope to Gide I
I love a good Trollope. Well, let me qualify that. I have gained immense satisfaction from the Trollopes I have read: viz. The Barchester series, all six of them, and Dr. Wortle's School. I re-read all of them, in the correct chronological order of course, last year. More recently, I have been dipping into one of the Trollope Society's excellently produced tomes - Anthony Trollope on Clergyman of the Church of England (others I have include A Guide to Trollope by the Geroulds and Barchester Pilgrimage by Ronald A. Knox).
Sunday, 6 September 2020
Susanna Gregory's Matthew Bartholomew series
I have just finished reading The Sanctuary Murders - Susanna Gregory's twenty-fourth chronicle of Matthew Bartholomew. The first of the series - A Plague on both your Houses - was published way back in 1996, I have them both in their first edition paperbacks; and I have the other twenty-two chronicles, neatly side by side, now taking up nearly a whole shelf in my Library.
Warner Books - 1996 Sphere paperback - 2020
For the first time since 1996, there was a two-year gap between the penultimate and last books. Is this a sign of Gregory tiring of her creation, or just taking it easy as the years roll by? It is interesting the Michael Arnold's Stryker series, set in the English Civil War, started at a pace - six books in five years. A hiatus has now lasted four years, with no real sign of the seventh tome appearing.
I trawled through some of the reviews on Amazon and came across this one about the first Matthew Bartholomew story: Although this historical mystery is already 23-years-old, it's still as fresh now as it was then...it's also a story where all the characters come vividly to life and where the historical details are wonderfully worked out,,,and not to forget the delightful picturing of the atmospheric surroundings of Cambridge...you'll find two well-drawn maps of Cambridge and of Michaelhouse... In fact, although the map of Cambridge has remained the same in all the books, the one of Michaelhouse disappeared from then on; a pity, as occasionally it would be useful to reacquaint oneself with the college layout (admittedly an imaginary one). 79% of reviewers gave the book a 5 or 4 star (58% the former). It has clearly 'travelled well'. So far 83% of reviewers have given the latest book a 5*. Not a bad track run!
However, the very first review (a mere 2*) did have this to say: I've been reading the Matthew Bartholomew series for many years and, unfortunately, I think the author has run out of ideas. The book was a turgid trip around 14thc Cambridge with no tension or interest, just a desire to reach the last page. It would help if the hero had some kind of love life, but the author just does not like Matthew's bride-to-be, Matilde. In this book she is away from Cambridge, fetching an elderly aunt. In the last few books she is mentioned but rarely puts in an appearance. Whilst never stooping to the epithet 'turgid', I must say there is a ring of truth here. (I find the same in the Thomas Chaloner series, set in Restoration London - Thomas had already lost one wife before the series took off, marries a shrew who also dies, and seems to prefer time spent with spy-masters, retired and active.) Matthew, the medical tutor, spends more time as the university's corpse examiner, and in the company of the Benedictine monk, the heavy-boned Michael. Inevitably, the characteristics of the two men, and their relationship, become repetitive and I occasionally wanted them to 'hurry up' with their surmising (and wrong alleyways). Gregory undoubtedly does her research, and alludes to it at the end of most of her books, but she perhaps brings too many characters into play at times - a ploy to keep the reader guessing as to who the culprit[s] is.
Another reviewer suggested: Susanna needs to bring what has been a most admirable series to a conclusion. I shall miss my Cambridge friends but it is time to draw a line. Many thanks Susanna for all the entertainment. Perhaps the suggestion that Matthew will leave Michaelhouse to marry Matilde will bring the curtain down in a final book?
However, I am on the treadmill as a 'series addict' or serial thriller; so will continue to send off for the next Susanna Gregory (Matthew Bartholomew and Thomas Challoner); Sarah Hawkswood (Bradecote and Catchpoll); Michael Arnold (Stryker - if he returns!); and C. J. Sansom (Matthew Shardlake); as well as the thriller writer stable of Scott Mariani (Ben Hope - number 22 comes out in November!) and others such as Sam Bourne, Raymond Khoury and Chris Kuzneski.
Friday, 28 August 2020
A return to Sarah Hawkwood's Historical Mysteries
The second reason is that I decided to read the remaining four Bradecote and Catchpoll Historical Mystery novels one after the other.
Sunday, 9 August 2020
Helen MacInnes' last novel: 'Ride a Pale Horse'
Well, I've reached and read the last of Helen MacInnes's novels; it did not disappoint. Ride a Pale Horse (1984) leaves Robert Renwick, who had figured in the previous three stories, behind and, instead focuses once more on an 'amateur'. As always, the hero (this time heroine) is an American having to battle with the typical MacInnes 'baddies' - communists from Russia and anarchists. Karen Cornell, is a US journalist sent to Europe for the Prague Convocation for Peace. The city, still under Russian supervision, is one of MacInnes's favourite settings, used in several of her previous novels. Whilst there, Cornell agrees to help a high-level Czech bureaucrat escape to the West. But is he all that he seems - well, no! She is told to contact a CIA expert, Peter Bristow, once she returns to Washington.







































